Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 05:22:17 +1000 From: andrew clarke <mail@ozzmosis.com> To: Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com> Cc: George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com>, FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Not to beat a dead horse, but ... Message-ID: <20140609192217.GA69813@ozzmosis.com> In-Reply-To: <CAPS9%2BSuR=F2jCsp=%2BHvU3kaZvTtULZ5D%2BkX-1PZdmHd1RP1RSw@mail.gmail.com> References: <5394A848.7030609@m5p.com> <CAPS9%2BSuR=F2jCsp=%2BHvU3kaZvTtULZ5D%2BkX-1PZdmHd1RP1RSw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun 2014-06-08 20:58:36 UTC+0200, Andreas Nilsson (andrnils@gmail.com) wrote: > > The party line seems to be, "Well, everybody knows SCHED_ULE sucks > > on uniprocessors." Hello? Not everybody has upgraded to multiple > > core or hyperthreaded processors yet. Do we really want to write > > off every uniprocessor piece of hardware out here? > > > Yes? Can you even buy a system today that is uniprocessor? My phone is > a dual core thing, and it got written of because of its "meagre" > hardware. Top of the line phones has 8 cores. So, seriously, what > non-ancient system have you acquired that is uniprocessor? Please > include links for available hardware for laptops, desktops or servers. Don't discount virtual machines, where a FreeBSD guest OS might be configured to use only one of the host system's CPUs.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140609192217.GA69813>