Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:22:45 -0500 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: daniele <meslists@yahoo.fr> Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: incorrect version number ? Message-ID: <1260051765.22108.12.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <4B1AB015.9030702@yahoo.fr> References: <4B164D8A.6090304@yahoo.fr> <1259968283.89305.8.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <4B1AB015.9030702@yahoo.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-snW252+xtK+JDsekT55k Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 20:10 +0100, daniele wrote: > :-) I had no doubt this is 2.28.1. > Is there a specific reason why the version number that shows up is=20 > different from the actual version ? Or just a convention ? > Thanks !! As I said, the GNOME developers forgot to bump the version. Joe >=20 > Daniele >=20 >=20 > Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 12:20 +0100, daniele wrote: > >> Hi ! > >> > >> I just fresh compiled the gnome port. > >> Opening "System -> About Gnome" one reads 'Version : 2.28.0'. The=20 > >> version showing is probably not correct: I suppose it should be 'Versi= on=20 > >> : 2.28.1' > >=20 > > The GNOME developers did not bump the micro version in gnome-desktop. > > The version as released is 2.28.1, though. > >=20 > > Joe > >=20 --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-snW252+xtK+JDsekT55k Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAksa3TMACgkQb2iPiv4Uz4dwmwCeK//4aZ5EciCh+mZBUN8ElFGP WXkAn0BMVTxPwBlSvw9VsPgKDsDElChG =eWxg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-snW252+xtK+JDsekT55k--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1260051765.22108.12.camel>