Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 22:26:28 -0800 From: Brian Behlendorf <brian@hyperreal.org> To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NOW/MOSIX/Beowulf Message-ID: <4.1.19981229222419.03d929f0@hyperreal.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9812300126520.330-100000@thelab.hub.org> References: <3689B28A.E73F3B5E@pipeline.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 01:27 AM 12/30/98 -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote: >On Wed, 30 Dec 1998, Andre Oppermann wrote: > >> Steven P. Donegan wrote: >> > >> > On a completely different subject :-) >> > >> > Given FreeBSD-current's performance, and SMP capabilities, has anyone >> > addressed using FreeBSD in a Network-Of-Workstations/MOSIX/Beowulf style >> > baby supercomputer? MOSIX (last time I checked) was BSDI only. Any >> > thoughts? I'm looking at highly scalable email/ldap applications. >> >> Check out our work: http://www.nrg4u.com >> >> It's an LDAP enabling Qmail patch and qmail in itself is highly >> scalable. A new patch release is on the way. > >Okay, I'll bite...*what* does this have to do with the question posed? "highly scalable email/ldap applications" wasn't part of the question, granted, but it was his end goal... Brian --=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- History is made at night; brian@hyperreal.org character is what you are in the dark. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.1.19981229222419.03d929f0>