Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 11:23:42 +0200 From: "Niclas Zeising" <niclas.zeising@gmail.com> To: "Robert Watson" <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/mtree BSD.include.dist BSD.usr.dist src/include Makefile src/lib Makefile src/lib/libatm Makefile atm_addr.c cache_key.c ioctl_subr.c ip_addr.c ip_checksum.c libatm.h timer.c src/rescue/rescue Makefile src/sbin/atm Makefile .. Message-ID: <bc292860805270223u3cacf55cia72b81d322242d76@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20080527101923.O35026@fledge.watson.org> References: <bc292860805270035p1df1d195k7325f708ee1fe77@mail.gmail.com> <20080527084233.T65662@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20080527100846.M35026@fledge.watson.org> <20080527091101.W65662@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20080527101517.O35026@fledge.watson.org> <bc292860805270218q547b7d1x21424750fd9b3342@mail.gmail.com> <20080527101923.O35026@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 27 May 2008, Niclas Zeising wrote: > >>> Antoine has helpfully pointed out that the glimpse search string to use >>> is actually MK_ATM, which has lots of references. >> >> If that's the case, I stand corrected. I wasn't really aware there was >> more than one ATM implementation, and I thought you've deleted the one that >> was and so the knob should be gone. I use the knob myself since I don't need >> the ATM bits :) Regards! //Niclas > > Yes, there's been some lack of clarity on this point, so perhaps I should > have been more clear in the commit message: we had multiple implementations, > and what I've done is remove the more complicated, older, non-MPSAFE one. > FreeBSD still supports ATM and will continue to do so for the forseeable > future (we have active maintenance, etc). > > Robert N M Watson > Computer Laboratory > University of Cambridge > Ok, thanks for the clarification. Then the WITHOUT_ATM knob probably should be updated to control the compilation of those implementations instead, if it doesn't already, and if it's feasible. To be honest, I don't know whether it does something or not. Regards! Niclas Zeising
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bc292860805270223u3cacf55cia72b81d322242d76>