Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 28 May 2002 10:48:04 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
Cc:        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/emulators/linux_base Makefile distinfo.alpha distinfo.i386 pkg-plist.alpha pkg-plist.i386
Message-ID:  <20020528104804.A60799@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020528173231.GC306@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>; from marcel@xcllnt.net on Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:32:31AM -0700
References:  <200205280235.g4S2ZPr85521@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020528040504.GB55559@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20020528002336.A33431@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020528081154.GA86369@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20020528081548.D33762@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020528173231.GC306@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:32:31AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> I see. So the objective I had ends up being less beneficial than deliberate
> breakages.

When were you going to finish your objectives?  The MAINTAINER of the
linux_base* ports is "ports@freebsd.org"; so you seemed to have divorced
yourself from them.  If you were still listed as the maintainer, I would
be pushing you to finish your objectives rather than stepping in myself.

> Hmmm... I don't have a good solution for the implied problems,
> so that makes your approach probably the best. Although I must say that I'm
> disappointed to learn that we apparently need to break more eggs than we
> put in the omelet to get peoples attention.

*sigh* when was someone else going to do something about this?

> > Uh, to run all linux binaries easier than we do today.
> 
> It helps to define the things that make it hard and how you think you
> want to address it. You don't normally attract engineers with vague
> mission statements. It only attracts managers :-)

Some binary ports today require linux_base-7.  Installing linux_base-7
blows away an linux_base[-6] installation.  The two ports do not
co-exist.  THAT IS THE THE HARD ISSUE.  Installing linux_base-6 and
linux_base-7 in any order should leave a usable Linux compatibility
installation.  Some apps require RH7, we know this set.  Some work with
both RH6 and RH7; and some only work with RH6.  We do not fully know
either of these sets and no one has bothered to figure them out.  I now
am, and this is the approach I chose to take.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020528104804.A60799>