Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:29:52 +0400 (MSD) From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: New preview patch for ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion Message-ID: <20040622132451.K6489@mp2.macomnet.net> In-Reply-To: <xzp659kkkt8.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <40D754D5.1070805@freebsd.org> <20040622115532.W5744@mp2.macomnet.net> <xzp659kkkt8.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, 11:23+0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> writes: > > In fact, our real world tests shown the current -CURRENT comparing to > > RELENG_5_2 is in a very bad shape. > > You'll have to substantiate that. All *my* real world tests show that > -CURRENT is a lot more stable and functional than RELENG_5_2. Yesterday -CURRENT leaks kernel memory very quickly and panics after 10 - 15 mins up. Machine is 2x3GHz Xeon, 4GB RAM, ~5000 httpd/ftpd tcp sessions, 300-400Mbps output, ~50TB output in a day. The same config (kernel, sysctl's, loader tunables, hardware) works well with RELENG_5_2. -- Maxim Konovalov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040622132451.K6489>