Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:02:04 -0800 From: Artem Belevich <fbsdlist@src.cx> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [dtrace] syscall provider naming convention. Message-ID: <AANLkTinJrBQSYoOt_d4eMhWpVhU7tJkvafWKdu71j55A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4D1077AB.4010707@freebsd.org> References: <AANLkTi=z1_KWKmhqFjNYHZfgAyPgsUVvgJ0P29KOPpnZ@mail.gmail.com> <20101211215341.0000097c@unknown> <AANLkTi=ehLNs8aeYfGUattetm7oMj8HhEB1Vnep9uAZk@mail.gmail.com> <20101213103535.00005f3d@unknown> <4D061E00.7050606@freebsd.org> <AANLkTinJrCRscZwYCAwXERTs6X=-yaz6go3FTSmc6Zdx@mail.gmail.com> <4D0F3AD6.9080002@freebsd.org> <AANLkTikkpbJV0v1=mBc%2BnFBh_diyAjUjaN8BUKwEZZhp@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinRGx-r-MpusXecTpjKbwAUHktM6qPxRxz1B8DX@mail.gmail.com> <4D1077AB.4010707@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I have one comment though. =A0I am not sure about renaming syscall.ko to > syscall_freebsd.ko. You mean systrace_freebsd.ko. I've renamed it for consistency with other systrace provider variants. I can change it back. > Perhaps we could keep the old name? =A0Or add a new module > under that name that would load native syscall module and all emulation s= yscall > modules (if any)? I'm not sure that creating an umbrella 'systrace' module is worth it. "kldload /boot/kernel/systrace*" should do that just fine. The reason dtrace exists is that there are number of modules with dtrace providers that are not easily distinguishable by their name. --Artem
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinJrBQSYoOt_d4eMhWpVhU7tJkvafWKdu71j55A>