Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 16:51:45 -0800 (PST) From: patl@phoenix.volant.org To: Robert Watson <robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ACL's Message-ID: <ML-3.3.921459105.6212.patl@asimov> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990314174217.5121K-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> So, does anyone have any examples of situations handled incorrectly/badly > by allowing only the owner of a file to link() it? I'm sure there have been times when that would have caused an irritating need to su. How would you feel about relaxing that to owner or anyone with write permission? (And I suspect I'd still want that to be a sysctl flag that could revert to current behavour.) -Pat To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ML-3.3.921459105.6212.patl>