Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 9 Apr 2008 17:08:38 +0200
From:      Gary Jennejohn <gary.jennejohn@freenet.de>
To:        pav@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, joerg@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/simulavr Makefile
Message-ID:  <20080409170838.3c2196ac@peedub.jennejohn.org>
In-Reply-To: <1207747572.3684.42.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
References:  <200804082151.m38Lp8P5099496@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080409170134.b7c2c60d.stas@FreeBSD.org> <1207746223.3684.38.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20080409171006.71497d1c.stas@FreeBSD.org> <1207746652.3684.40.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20080409172224.08474c39.stas@FreeBSD.org> <1207747572.3684.42.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:26:12 +0200
Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> Stanislav Sedov p____e v st 09. 04. 2008 v 17:22 +0400:
> 
> > > I don't know. I just marked the port BROKEN :)
> > > 
> > 
> > Ok, portmgr don't know... (/me is making a note in his notebook)
> > :-)
> > 
> > pav-the-mark-broken-monster 
> 
> That's me, when I take a break from being
> pav-the-mailforwarding-party-crasher :)
> 
> As for the simulavr port, I don't have a strong preference for it moving
> to emulators or staying where it's now.
> 

Just my 2 (Euro)cents.  Considering that it's been in devel for the
last 5-1/2 years it seems a littel extreme to move it to emulation for
purely aesthetic reasons.

---
Gary Jennejohn



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080409170838.3c2196ac>