Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 11 Apr 1999 12:58:18 -0700 (PDT)
From:      "Jason C. Wells" <jcwells@u.washington.edu>
To:        FreeBSD-chat <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
Subject:   /etc/defaults/really_defaults/really_really_defaults
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9904111221170.5935-100000@s8-37-26.student.washington.edu>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<mild vent>

What's the functional difference between the former rc.conf and
defaults/rc.conf? Why not 
/etc/defaults/really_defaults/really_really_defaults/rc.conf? (Rhetorical
question)

If we realllllly shouldn't change settings in defaults/rc.conf then just
roll those variable assignments into /etc/rc which we are also warned not
to play with. (This is where a developer should tell me I don't see the
grand scheme.)

My vote from userland is scrap /etc/defaults. Change mergemaster a bit.
Use rc and rc.conf and be done with it. Let make world handle rc but leave
rc.conf.

Boy, if I ever become a committer I will rename all of those files to the
most perfectly correct and canonical *.ini!

Catchya Later,		|	Give me UNIX or give me a typewriter.
Jason Wells		|	http://www.freebsd.org/



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9904111221170.5935-100000>