Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 16:31:40 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Ernst de Haan <ernst@jollem.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Shouldn't editors/jedit depend on java/jfc ? Message-ID: <3B02813C.3A08561@FreeBSD.org> References: <20010516144617.A9023@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl> <3B027A0E.BB3DDBD3@FreeBSD.org> <20010516151946.A9383@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ernst de Haan wrote: > Maxim, > > > > I wonder why the editors/jedit port downloads a separate swingall.jar file. > > > Can't we make jedit depend on java/jfc instead ? > > The reason here is the size of jfc. > > Okay, then how about this: > > * Create a new port `java/jfc-bin' that just installs swingall.jar somewhere > under /usr/local/share/java/classes > > * Make `java/jfc' depend on `java/jfc-bin' and not install a new swingall.jar > file > > * Make `editors/jedit' depend on `java/jfc-bin' > > Whaddayathink? Unfortunately jfc license doesn't permit this. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B02813C.3A08561>