Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 23 Apr 2014 13:52:35 +0300
From:      Ivan Klymenko <fidaj@ukr.net>
To:        Arto Pekkanen <isoa@kapsi.fi>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.org, x11@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [CFT] x11-servers/xorg-server with initial (GCD) Grand Central Dispatch support
Message-ID:  <20140423135235.251f2650@nonamehost.local>
In-Reply-To: <53566C2F.8090309@kapsi.fi>
References:  <20140420200534.72226779@nonamehost.local> <5354E550.7050803@freebsd.org> <20140421152732.716b897b@nonamehost.local> <53566C2F.8090309@kapsi.fi>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=D0=92 Tue, 22 Apr 2014 16:18:39 +0300
Arto Pekkanen <isoa@kapsi.fi> =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82:

> Wow, sounds cool! I just wanted to say thank you for researching
> something not officially researched elsewhere :)
>=20
> You could fork the current X.org port, and maintain a partial ports
> tree in a separate repository. Then people interested in testing the
> X.org with GCD support could easily use
> http://www.freshports.org/ports-mgmt/portshaker/ to merge your X.org
> with main ports tree.
>=20
> I've never used portshaker, nor maintained any port myself, but this
> seems like the right way to do it.
>=20

Thank you all responded.

Experimental branch development is at the following URL:
https://redports.org/browser/fidaj/x11-servers/xorg-server-GCD

At the moment I'm trying to find the cause of a failed building port
with support blocks (C language extension).



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140423135235.251f2650>