Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 11:55:40 +0000 From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> To: Mike Hoskins <mike@adept.org> Cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: firewall 'stateful failover' Message-ID: <20020612115540.A9893@spc.org> In-Reply-To: <20020610155455.Y96521-100000@snafu.adept.org>; from mike@adept.org on Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 04:10:56PM -0700 References: <20020610155455.Y96521-100000@snafu.adept.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike, This was on my list of 'cool things to do'; I'm pretty sure it's on other people's also. Perhaps something like CHATS funding might encourage it to bubble further up the priority queue? ;-) BMS On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 04:10:56PM -0700, Mike Hoskins wrote: > > Is there a way to handle the state table in ipfw/ipf? I could write > scripts to do 'failover', but I'm wandering if there's a way to 'share' > the state table between active and standby units or to pass the state > table from one firewall to another over a crossover. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020612115540.A9893>