Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 15:42:28 +0200 From: Cyrille Lefevre <cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@regency.nsu.ru> Cc: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net>, "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.ORG>, Mark Valentine <mark@thuvia.demon.co.uk>, Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Scripting languages (was: Re: Package system flaws?) Message-ID: <20020724134228.GA4475@gits.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20020724121335.A42303@regency.nsu.ru> References: <200207231706.g6NH6XOV076926@dotar.thuvia.org> <200207231745.g6NHjfZ47049@green.bikeshed.org> <20020723191638.GA53463@over-yonder.net> <20020724121335.A42303@regency.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 12:13:35PM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 02:16:38PM -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 01:45:41PM -0400 I heard the voice of > > Brian F. Feldman, and lo! it spake thus: > > > > > > to learn (much easier than learning how to do weird magic in sh). > > > > And much easier than joining Linux in having a sh-but-more-than-sh-so-we- > > -teach-more-people-to-use-non-standard-extensions-by-reflex. > > Wait, doesn't Linux (all of them) just have sh -> bash ? the reason why many GNU/Linux `sh' scripts aren't portable at all. unfortunately, I have no good example in my mind right now, sorry. Cyrille. -- Cyrille Lefevre mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020724134228.GA4475>