Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:36:53 -0400 From: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org> To: David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, standards@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: libstdc++ does not contain fabsl symbol Message-ID: <20021023123653.A39814@espresso.q9media.com> In-Reply-To: <20021023153809.GA7503@HAL9000.homeunix.com>; from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU on Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 08:38:09AM -0700 References: <20021020025400.GA13776@xor.obsecurity.org> <20021022082241.GG3325@sunbay.com> <20021022184605.GA85779@xor.obsecurity.org> <20021022172912.B22851@espresso.q9media.com> <20021023153809.GA7503@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU> writes: > Thus spake Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG>: > > No one has started work on any of the C99 math functions yet. I > > think with the exception of the math functions we conform to C99. > > Actually, I hacked up some patches for fpclassify(), is*(), and > friends some time ago. But nobody was interested in compliance at > the time except for a couple of port maintainers, so I didn't > bother finishing it up. In any case, I no longer have the time. > (It's fairly easy, given that some of the code is already there, > but a bit more work to optimize for every architecture FreeBSD > supports.) Note that while you're adding the C99 math stuff, you > might want to fix up float.h, which is just wrong about long > doubles (see PR i386/38288). Right, I should have said no one has started committing C99 math functions. Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021023123653.A39814>