Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 02:14:21 +0200 (EET) From: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: verbose device probing ? Message-ID: <20030122021013.C43637-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee> In-Reply-To: <3E2DD1C0.3D0ED169@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: > > The priority field is rather ridiculous, in a volunteer project, > at least one that does not have some sort of scheduling enforcement > (i.e. one could envision a system where all changes must have PR's > associated with them, and priority was assigned by consensus > through the email moral equivalent of a "manager's meeting", and > people were not permitted to check in priority N items, if there > were any PR's of priority > N+1 outstanding, etc.). > This is not really true - you can always use the field as a hint to wannabee hackers and patch submitters as to what they should be spending their time on. And while nothing can make sure they actually spend time on those and not other things (whetever related to FreeBSD at all or not) , its better than a mass of largely uncategorized bugs. > -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030122021013.C43637-100000>