Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Apr 2003 14:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
From:      "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@freebsd.org.ru>
To:        freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: standards/51292: [PATCH] add ecvt()/fcvt()/gcvt() functions (SUSv3)
Message-ID:  <200304222150.h3MLoHQ2048918@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR standards/51292; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@freebsd.org.ru>
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: standards/51292: [PATCH] add ecvt()/fcvt()/gcvt() functions (SUSv3)
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 01:47:40 +0400

 On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 07:28:49AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
 > On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, Sergey A.Osokin wrote:
 > 
 > > >Description:
 > > 	add ecvt()/fcvt()/gcvt() functions (SUSv3) (obtained from OpenBSD)
 > > 	+ add locale-specific tricks
 > 
 > > +.Sh DESCRIPTION
 > > +.Bf -symbolic
 > > +These functions are provided for compatibility with legacy code.
 > > +New code should use the
 > > +.Xr snprintf 3
 > > +function for improved safety and portability.
 > 
 > This statement was true 15 years ago when C90, (er, only 13 years ago)
 > didn't standardize these functions.  At least FreeBSD hasn't needed them
 > for 10 years.  Bringing them back now is a bug in whatever standards have
 > them IMO.  Unfortunately, POSIX.1 has them in its XSI section.
 
 So, why OpenBSDers add them 4 monthes ago to they source tree?
 
 Also quote from SUSv3:
 CHANGE HISTORY
     First released in Issue 4, Version 2.
 Issue 5
     Moved from X/OPEN UNIX extension to BASE.
 
 -- 
 
 Rgdz,                        /"\  ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
 Sergey Osokin aka oZZ,       \ /    AGAINST HTML MAIL
 http://ozz.pp.ru/             X          AND NEWS
                              / \



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200304222150.h3MLoHQ2048918>