Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 15:54:10 +0100 From: ptitoliv <ptitoliv@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net> To: Lute Mullenix <lute@vfemail.net> Cc: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Main differences between RELEASE_X and RELEASE_X_Y branches Message-ID: <41B32112.4000204@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net> In-Reply-To: <20041205084637.0e830d1b@agnes.myhome.net> References: <41B23F3E.4060400@frenchsuballiance.cjb.net> <20041205084637.0e830d1b@agnes.myhome.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >Well to the best of my knowledge, while STABLE is "stable" it is still in >development, which means there could be occasional glitches that need >ironed out. RELEASE is the branch that is the most tried and true. >Occasional security and bug updates but ready for public consumption. > >I personally stick with RELEASE as it has the new features, and is >less likely to have unexpected results. > > > Hi, Thank you for your answer :). So according to you, it is better for a server to use a RELEASE version than STABLE version. And another question, is it necessary and important to change when a new RELEASE is ... released ? Thank you Best Regards, Ptitoliv
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41B32112.4000204>