Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 09:17:40 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: dg@root.com Cc: michaelh@cet.co.jp, terry@lambert.org, ponds!rivers@dg-rtp.dg.com, dyson@freefall.freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: More info on the daily panics... Message-ID: <199611081617.JAA12148@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199611081024.CAA05116@root.com> from "David Greenman" at Nov 8, 96 02:24:38 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >Are you going to "out-stubborn" me again? > > I don't think you understand: I understand your position on this and the > benefits as you've articulated them are very clear. I simply disagree with > you on this topic. My opinion is that I don't like what it does to the sources > (adding lots of redundant and usually useless assertions), nor do I like the > style (macroized condition expressions). My opinion on this isn't going to > change, and I'm not the only core member who has this opinion. As an alternative, may I suggest properly abstracting the interfaces so that no matter how the "black box" that implements them acts, it acts correctly? Regards, Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611081617.JAA12148>