Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 18:51:01 -0700 From: Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Johan Karlsson <k@numeri.campus.luth.se>, <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Add note to UPDATING (was: Re: inetd_enable Message-ID: <15552.51589.974004.503273@horsey.gshapiro.net> In-Reply-To: <20020419182013.Q18267-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> References: <15552.30670.690121.496470@horsey.gshapiro.net> <20020419182013.Q18267-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
DougB> The more I think about this, the more I think it might need to be DougB> yes in both places. Is there a way to configure new sendmail to DougB> accept outgoing connections without needing daemons running? If so, DougB> it might make more sense to have that be the default setup, and DougB> leave the _enable off both places. If not, we should probably turn DougB> it on both places, with just the outgoing mail stuff set up by DougB> default. If sendmail_enable=NO, then the next one is sendmail_submit_enable which, by default, is YES. That one starts a daemon that only listens on localhost. See /etc/mail/README for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15552.51589.974004.503273>