Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 12:49:31 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nfs server not responding / is alive again Message-ID: <20041005124922.B40597@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20041005110133.48bbbc2f.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <20041004001747.J10913@ganymede.hub.org> <20041005052249.GC917@alex.lan> <20041005113329.D40597@ganymede.hub.org> <20041005110133.48bbbc2f.wmoran@potentialtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Bill Moran wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> wrote: > >> On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Bill Moran wrote: >> >>> What kind of network topology is between the two machines? Do you >>> notice a high load on the hub/switch/routers during these activities? >>> You may be able to improve the intervening network topology to improve >>> the problem as well. >> >> My bad ... I thought i had mentioned it in the original ... the nfs mount >> is from local machine to local machine, to do what nullfs normally would >> provide were I to risk it ... namely, to get at the 'bottom layer' of a >> unionfs based storage system ... > > Well ... that's just weird. > > I guess the same problem could apply: if the loopback slows down when the > kernel is loaded, it could cause the same effect. > > Have you tried forcing TCP mounts? IIRC, that's what solved the problem > for me. Haven't tried yet, but will ... thanks :) ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041005124922.B40597>