Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 21:22:33 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= <roger.pau@citrix.com> To: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> Cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@FreeBSD.org>, xen@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CFR] Event channel Interrupts and unified Xen interrupt infrastructure. Message-ID: <521F9F79.60900@citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <521F9DC5.6040606@freebsd.org> References: <7D29BB74-2341-4164-B2B8-85A4CAB3A6CE@FreeBSD.org> <521F9DC5.6040606@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 29/08/13 21:15, Colin Percival wrote: > On 08/29/13 09:32, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: >> I've been working to get the next chunk of Spectra/Roger Pau Monné Xen work into head. The latest version of the patch I'm working on can be found here: >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~gibbs/xen_intr.diff >> >> I will continue my testing today and commit it tonight unless I hear complaints. Comments, corrections, improvements, and bug reports welcome. > > Could this patch be split into functional and non-functional components? It's > distracting having everything mixed up together in a single megapatch. Even > committing the s/unlikely/__predict_false/ separately would help. > > How do you intend to have Xen HVM work in the GENERIC kernel configuration? > Will you be adding 'options XENHVM' to GENERIC? I'm currently working on this, I expect to have a patch ready tomorrow (I still have to test it on bare metal). Roger.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?521F9F79.60900>