Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:14:19 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: malloc Message-ID: <1821.1035206059@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:25:43 %2B0200." <E183Yoh-0009TR-00@cse.cs.huji.ac.il>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <E183Yoh-0009TR-00@cse.cs.huji.ac.il>, Danny Braniss writes: >the attached program - which shows the 'efficiancy' of our scientific >programmers - tickled my curiosity. > >if compiled under Linux, it would run fine on FreeBSD 4.7-stable. >compiled on FreeBSD it would bomb. > >so i fixed some kernel values (options MAXDSIZ="(2*1024*1024*1024)") >and it run to complition, but: >fbsd compiled: complex-2 took 23.652872 seconds, mem used=800000000(762M) >linux : complex-2 took 11.969896 seconds, mem used=800000000(762M) > > >comments? What a lame program... If this program is indicative of your real-world work-load, you can optimize a lot by getting better programmers. If it is not indicative, then forget about it. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1821.1035206059>