Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 13:38:54 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: obrien@NUXI.com Cc: Wilko Bulte <wilko@yedi.iaf.nl>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How To Burn CDs Message-ID: <199908212038.NAA41793@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 21 Aug 1999 12:30:09 PDT." <19990821123009.H56777@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > > "Another possibility, if you have the RAM, is to use the team(1) > > > > program (it's in the ports) to buffer the data as it goes to the burner. > > > > > > Any reason not to use ``cdrecord -fs=64m'' (or some simular size) > > > > Any reason to? I mean, I never had to go over the default cdrecord uses. > > Since the author was already suggesting the use of team(1) he obvisiously > wants a larger buffer. I was mearly asking if there was something about > team(1) better than ``cdrecord -fs=XX''. > To me in the context of cdrecord, cdrecord's option "fs" and team are about the same. Perhaps someone more familiar with cdrecord fifo.c's circular buffer algorithm and team can express a different opinion. Cheers -- Amancio Hasty hasty@rah.star-gate.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199908212038.NAA41793>