Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:28:39 -0700
From:      Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com>
To:        Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de>
Cc:        Alexander Best <alexbestms@math.uni-muenster.de>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "James R. Van Artsdalen" <james-freebsd-current@jrv.org>
Subject:   Re: `gpart show` and secondary GPT header
Message-ID:  <19563E0A-3A5A-4B0C-BB89-934A44CF4A82@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A37C1A7.1070801@omnilan.de>
References:  <permail-200906131853081e86ffa80000190b-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de> <A7C988A9-DCFD-422B-B39D-B912FECEFD0D@mac.com> <4A344A9F.5020708@jrv.org> <BD2A6E6D-EC33-408E-913B-CAF96F774ACD@mac.com> <4A344C67.8000101@jrv.org> <ADAD4EA3-0D07-4CD5-8805-3D21BB40A5AD@mac.com> <4A37C1A7.1070801@omnilan.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Jun 16, 2009, at 9:00 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:

> Marcel Moolenaar schrieb am 2009-06-14 07:23 (localtime):
> ...
>>>>> Jun 13 06:31:42 bigback kernel: GEOM: ad12: the secondary GPT  
>>>>> table is
>>>>> corrupt or invalid.
>>>>> Jun 13 06:31:42 bigback kernel: GEOM: ad12: using the primary  
>>>>> only --
>>>>> recovery suggested.
>
> I'm curious what the correct way to recover is.
> I also tried dd, but without success.
> `gpt` had a recover functionality if I remember corretcly.

Recovery is not yet implemented in gpart. That would be
the correct way to recover. And yes, gpt(8) has recovery.
Thus, gpt(8) is the right way to recover on -STABLE.

FYI,

-- 
Marcel Moolenaar
xcllnt@mac.com






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19563E0A-3A5A-4B0C-BB89-934A44CF4A82>