Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 04:24:18 -0500 (EST) From: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern imgact_elf.c kern_descrip.ckern_exec.c uipc_syscalls.c vfs_bio.c vfs_subr.c vfs_syscalls.c Message-ID: <20050125042317.D18864@mail.chesapeake.net> In-Reply-To: <200501250039.j0P0d0AB091446@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200501250039.j0P0d0AB091446@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > phk 2005-01-25 00:39:00 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > sys/kern imgact_elf.c kern_descrip.c kern_exec.c > uipc_syscalls.c vfs_bio.c vfs_subr.c > vfs_syscalls.c > Log: > Don't use VOP_GETVOBJECT, use vp->v_object directly. How does this effect stacking? Originally this was done so we could get the appropriate level of vnode object. Was this discussed somewhere that I missed? > > Revision Changes Path > 1.157 +1 -1 src/sys/kern/imgact_elf.c > 1.273 +1 -2 src/sys/kern/kern_descrip.c > 1.262 +3 -2 src/sys/kern/kern_exec.c > 1.212 +2 -1 src/sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c > 1.474 +8 -10 src/sys/kern/vfs_bio.c > 1.571 +12 -11 src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c > 1.368 +4 -5 src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050125042317.D18864>