Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:30:43 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@freebsd.org> To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Traffic Shaping not working correctly after ipfw coverted to use pfil_hooks API Message-ID: <20041026133043.A24138@xorpc.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <417BBE2C.A285792B@freebsd.org>; from andre@freebsd.org on Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 04:37:32PM %2B0200 References: <429af92e041020205510c66168@mail.gmail.com> <4177B899.5EC32F5F@freebsd.org> <429af92e04102114472add0e51@mail.gmail.com> <417835C7.7060808@freebsd.org> <429af92e04102404115bc7bc80@mail.gmail.com> <417BBE2C.A285792B@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 04:37:32PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: > [bouncing over to Luigi] > > Luigi, do you have any idea what might be going wrong here? no, sorry... I have to say the ipfw/natd/dummynet configuration is rather convoluted here so it is a bit hard to tell whether the problem is in dummynet calls or divert sockets. I am also confused by the numbers in the initial report: > > > >>Vincent Poy wrote: > > > >> > > > >>>However, after the latest -CURRENT upgrade, it will do 200KB/sec down > > > >>>and 52KB/sec up. If I only download only, then it does show > > > >>>650KB/sec. Normally, when I change the bandwidth to a number lower > > > >>>than 480Kbps for the pipe, the download speeds would go up when > > > >>>downloading. However, I have tried in 10kbps steps down to 350kbps > > > >>>but it still did not top 200KB/sec in downloading. there is a mix of two different notations, Kbps and KB/sec, and i cannot make sense of them. Finally, I am curious as to why one would mix the upload and download traffic, i believe *DSL data rates are independent in the two directions unlike analog modems... cheers luigi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041026133043.A24138>