Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 11:08:13 -0600 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: rminnich@Sarnoff.COM, msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au Cc: deischen@iworks.InterWorks.org, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I2O only available under NDA? Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19970711110813.0087e280@mail.lariat.org> In-Reply-To: <882564D1.005D4E96.00@IWNS2.infoworld.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 12:27 PM 7/11/97 -0400, rminnich@Sarnoff.COM wrote: >I think you can make a pretty strong case that I2O is there to cover for >the performance failings of Windows/NT. >ron Whether or not it is, it'll never be a contender unless it's open. The representative's lame excuse regarding patents is bogus, by the way. The patents apply only to the hardware, not software. --Brett Glass
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.1.32.19970711110813.0087e280>