Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:41:26 +0200 (MEST) From: Adriaan de Groot <adridg@sci.kun.nl> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Is 5.2.1-R-amd64 a reasonable (viable) platform? Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0407242033020.22867-100000@wn4.sci.kun.nl>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The KDE-FreeBSD team is gearing up for more packaging runs, and we're wondering what to build them for for amd64. Kris K does -CURRENT packages, so we don't need to worry about them. For i386, we do 4.10-R, 4-STABLE, and 5.2.1-R as well, just to serve as many folks as possible. Which releases are viable for amd64? 4-X is out; 5.2.1-R is left as a candidate, but is it possible that there might be folks actually running that somewhere? I doubt it, since the lack of cvsup and - february it was - I guess the stack and redzone mess there was then _seem_ to make it a less-than-viable platform. What do you think? (More to the point, if you're running 5.2.1-R and not -CURRENT on amd64, would you want new KDE packages?)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.44.0407242033020.22867-100000>