Date: Thu, 25 Apr 1996 14:44:18 +0930 (CST) From: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au> To: spaz@u.washington.edu (John Utz) Cc: sef@kithrup.com, emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Has anyone grabbed the dos patches? Message-ID: <199604250514.OAA22988@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.92a.960424212250.9562B-100000@becker2.u.washington.edu> from "John Utz" at Apr 24, 96 09:24:24 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Utz stands accused of saying: > > Hi Sean; > > Mike's mail re patches implied the need for a ~current box. Is > this true? Has the kernel mutated to the point were this would be unusable > on a 2.1R box? With a bit of effort, you could probably mung the patches to fit a -stable kernel. Sef was working against a -current kernel and I didn't see any reason to fight it. Basically, look at the kernel diffs and see how hard it looks - there's not a lot of substance in it, just complexity 8) > John Utz spaz@u.washington.edu -- ]] Mike Smith, Software Engineer msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] Genesis Software genesis@atrad.adelaide.edu.au [[ ]] High-speed data acquisition and (GSM mobile) 0411-222-496 [[ ]] realtime instrument control (ph/fax) +61-8-267-3039 [[ ]] Collector of old Unix hardware. "Where are your PEZ?" The Tick [[
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604250514.OAA22988>