Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 26 May 1997 13:42:12 +0200
From:      Stefan Esser <se@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>
Cc:        scsi@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Oddness with NCR53C810
Message-ID:  <19970526134212.20835@x14.mi.uni-koeln.de>
In-Reply-To: <19970524124625.07596@keltia.freenix.fr>; from Ollivier Robert on Sat, May 24, 1997 at 12:46:25PM %2B0200
References:  <Pine.BSF.3.95.970523204439.567A-100000@why> <19970524102943.GO37893@uriah.heep.sax.de> <19970524124625.07596@keltia.freenix.fr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The NCR810a is an Ultra-capable version of the NCR810 I think.

No, sorry, not quite :)

The NCR/Symbios SCSI chips are:

810	the original, 8bit, FAST
810a	improved version of the 810, more efficent on the PCI bus
815	810 with BIOS support
860	810a with Ultra-SCSI support

820	810 with support for WIDE SCSI
825	improved 820 with BIOS support
825a	improved 825 with on-chip 4KB RAM
875	825a with Ultra-SCSI support
876	dual 875
895	875 with Ultra-2 support (40MHz sync. + LVD)

There are quite a number of cards with WIDE SCSI chips, but only an
8bit bus (the Symbios Sym8250S or Sym8750S and the Tekram DC-390U,
for example). Only very few WIDE NCR cards support differential bus
signals (the Sym8250D and Sym8751D do).

The Sym53c876 allows to put two Ultra-WIDE SCSI channels on one PCI
card, without the need for a PCI to PCI bridge. This is better than
an Adaptec 3940 with two SCSI chips behind a PPB, since it is cheaper
and avoids the latency and complexity introduced by the PPB ...

Regards, STefan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970526134212.20835>