Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:40:05 -0500 (CDT) From: Scott Bennett <bennett@cs.niu.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Gonzalo Nemmi <gnemmi@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Why is sendmail is part of the system and not a package? Message-ID: <200910280840.n9S8e5sG028495@mp.cs.niu.edu>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:03:12 -0200 Gonzalo Nemmi <gnemmi@gmail.com>
wrote:
>On Tuesday 27 October 2009 4:32:45 pm Erik Norgaard wrote:
>> Jonathan McKeown wrote:
>> > Just as a matter of interest, if you want to rip sendmail out of
>> > the base system, which MTA would you like to replace it with? Or
>> > are you suggesting the system ship with no way to handle mail?
>>
>> This thread moving of topic from OP, but it is always fair to debate
>> what should be considered a base system. Is an MTA a requirement or a
>> remnant from history?
>
>Dear Erik:
>
>Contrary to your belief the thread isn't moving of topic from OP, it's
>just taking the same default route it has been taking for ages:
Just so.
>1) telling the OP the OS needs an MTA
>2) telling the OP he can replace the default MTA
>3) telling the OP he can remove given MTA from base
>4) telling the OP about "historical reason"
This item has been neglected thus far in the current iteration of
this topic. The *historical* distinction that places sendmail squarely
in the base system and also relegates all other MTAs to ports is this:
sendmail was written for, and has been part of, BSD UNIX since the
earliest TCP/IP releases of BSD UNIX (4.1BSD or perhaps even 4.0cBSD),
whereas the rest were not and have not been.
>5) Not telling the OP why has FreeBSD has left so many historical reason
>behind to persuit new goals but retained Sendmail as the default
>MTA "for historical reasons".
>
>Sorry .. but that's the way it goes every time someone asks the same
>question.
>
And George Santayana's famous dictum may well apply even in this
case. :)
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**********************************************************************
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu *
*--------------------------------------------------------------------*
* "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good *
* objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *
* -- a standing army." *
* -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 *
**********************************************************************
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200910280840.n9S8e5sG028495>