Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 11:05:33 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/emulators/linux_base Makefile distinfo.alpha distinfo.i386 pkg-plist.alpha pkg-plist.i386 Message-ID: <20020528180533.GA540@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <20020528104804.A60799@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200205280235.g4S2ZPr85521@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020528040504.GB55559@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20020528002336.A33431@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020528081154.GA86369@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20020528081548.D33762@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020528173231.GC306@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20020528104804.A60799@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:48:04AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:32:31AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > I see. So the objective I had ends up being less beneficial than deliberate > > breakages. > > When were you going to finish your objectives? The objective to not break existing ports was reached the moment I committed linux_base-7. It was up to the port maintainers to help shape the final result by upgrading their ports and give me feedback. > > Hmmm... I don't have a good solution for the implied problems, > > so that makes your approach probably the best. Although I must say that I'm > > disappointed to learn that we apparently need to break more eggs than we > > put in the omelet to get peoples attention. > > *sigh* when was someone else going to do something about this? My guess would be the moment you stop doing it. A wild one, I might add... -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020528180533.GA540>