Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 11 Jan 2001 16:43:34 -0500 (EST)
From:      Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To:        Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au>
Cc:        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/clanlib Makefile ports/devel/clanlib/files patch-Sources_Util_fcvt.c patch-ah
Message-ID:  <200101112143.QAA49876@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20010112083558.C91242@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au>
References:  <200101092309.f09N90P48928@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010112083558.C91242@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Fri, 12 Jan 2001 08:35:58 +1100, Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au> said:

> I have also had occasions when fcvt() or dtoa() would allow simpler
> code than sprintf().  Wouldn't we be better off documenting our dtoa()
> and allowing other functions to access it?

[efg]cvt() are required by SUSv2.  The are included (under the XSI
extension) in draft 5 of POSIX.1-200x and marked LEGACY there, so they
won't be eligible for removal until 2006.  We really should just bite
the bullet and implement these functions.

-GAWollman



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101112143.QAA49876>