Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 22:12:26 +0100 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.org> To: Sander Vesik <sander.vesik@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Assuming We Want FreeBSD to Grow: Who Is It For? Message-ID: <200502172112.j1HLCQgX023578@fire.jhs.private> In-Reply-To: Message from Sander Vesik <sander.vesik@gmail.com> <dcb2c27a050217123424ed0d84@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sander Vesik wrote: > On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:33:22 +0100, Julian H. Stacey <jhs@berklix.org> wrote: > > > > Much hot air on advocacy@ does not qualify. Let's > > - Tell people to move to chat@freebsd.org. > > - Report offenders to postmaster@freebsd.org for blocking. > > - Request postmaster@freebsd.org appends to list definition: > > "Not for arguing about what FreeBSD is or where it should go." > > (developers on current@ etc, are unpaid, & advocacy@ people > > have no right to direct what FreeBSD is & will be.) > > I think its hould be slightly more openly worded - for example, > discussions (i mean rational discussions with technical details) of > what FreeBSD is may be in some warranted - consider for example > producing materials to promote the use of FreeBSD in embedded systems > or similar. OK, fine. Could you (or someone else) please suggest exact words to replace current http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy Furthering the Use of FreeBSD. Share ideas and plan to increase the number of companies and individuals using FreeBSD. Once a number of us back a tighter list definition, we can send it to postmaster@freebsd.org to request it be the official list definition. .. & then use it to tell windy people to go to chat@ or be blocked off list. Thanks - Julian Stacey Net & Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com Mail in Ascii (Html=Spam). Ihr Rauch = mein allergischer Kopfschmerz.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200502172112.j1HLCQgX023578>