Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:58:38 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Andrej Zverev <az@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/p5-Config-Model Makefile distinfo pkg-plist Message-ID: <20100819005838.GA24811@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4C6C6159.5060800@p6m7g8.com> References: <201008181153.o7IBrvlo010634@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100818184746.GA43513@FreeBSD.org> <AANLkTinfDgHsyWPFHSg6c=HdOrbAA2qTFrEd-SxQ13P_@mail.gmail.com> <4C6C6159.5060800@p6m7g8.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:40:25PM +0000, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > On 08/18/10 20:13, Andrej Zverev wrote: > > 2010/8/18 Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>: > >> Please assign RUN_DEPENDS correctly with := (immediate expansion > >> operator). Right now it is polluted with `devel/p5-Module-Build' and > >> extra one of `lang/perl5.10'. Consider attached patch. Point the > >> original submitter to section 5.7.2 of PH. > > > > Wow, didn't know about it. I will read PH for sure (never read it > > before actually). I thought that I don't need nothing except to check > > the assembly in the tinderbox and blind faith in PR plus ignoring some > > smarts guys like you. This will lead me to the hall of fame of the > > best commiters. Immortality!!! > > We're actually moving away from that. Fewer then 100 ports use this > right now. Whats prefered is to list the BUILD/RUN depends explicitly > which portlint tells you to do. I actually indent to fix portlint(1) in that regard. I do not see we should avoid doing handy things like bdels to rdeps assignment just because someone(tm) believes it's too hard for maintainers/committers to know make(1) well enough. This is, like, lets simplifay ze lenguidj, bicoz pipl hev hard taym ridin it. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100819005838.GA24811>