Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:56:33 +0200 From: Ulrich Spoerlein <spoerlein@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de> To: Maksim Yevmenkin <maksim.yevmenkin@savvis.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: request for comments: kbdmux(4) (long) Message-ID: <20050623195633.GA1187@galgenberg.net> In-Reply-To: <42BAFE37.4080504@savvis.net> References: <42BAFE37.4080504@savvis.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 23.06.2005 at 11:23:51 -0700, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: > - kbdmux model: kbdmux(4) is "super-keyboard" driver that consumes=20 > input (raw scancodes) from slave keyboards. the side effect is that=20 > _all_ keyboards attached to the kbdmux share the _same_ state.=20 > basically user can press ctrl on one keyboard and "C" on another=20 > keyboard and it still will work. is that good enough? In one way this is cool, in another way, I'm wondering: What if I had two keyboards with different layouts (one DE, one US). Will I be able to set up the correct keymap for both keyboards and will they work like they should? Ulrich Spoerlein --=20 PGP Key ID: F0DB9F44 Encrypted mail welcome! Fingerprint: F1CE D062 0CA9 ADE3 349B 2FE8 980A C6B5 F0DB 9F44 Ok, which part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn." didn't you understand? --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCuxPxmArGtfDbn0QRAtYAAJ9x/J+Tyw1SmgiiHSvOGU/HwbI4ZwCgzM8z YGYrKnGdhJoGicrQc2ZL10U= =myo7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050623195633.GA1187>