Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 09:14:44 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: "Jose M. Alcaide" <jose@we.lc.ehu.es> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Should we keep the vim5 port? Message-ID: <20011108091444.A44303@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20011108131502.B370@v-ger.we.lc.ehu.es>; from jose@we.lc.ehu.es on Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 01:15:02PM %2B0100 References: <20011107074751.A93028@dragon.nuxi.com> <20011107190747.D338@v-ger.we.lc.ehu.es> <20011107152632.D12949@dragon.nuxi.com> <20011108131502.B370@v-ger.we.lc.ehu.es>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 01:15:02PM +0100, Jose M. Alcaide wrote: > I agree with your objections to GTK. However, IMHO there is another reason > for defaulting to GTK: there are *lots* of ports (besides GNOME itself) > which depend on GTK; on the contrary, there are less ports needing > OpenMotif And that is because more people are giving up (like me) and switching software to using GNOME. But perhaps you have not considered that this is the *same* reasoning and situation we have today were many shops are moving from Unix to M$-Windows. So sorry, this argument carries zero weight with me (in fact it acutally carries negative weight as I don't want to be wrapped up in the killing of Motif(and Unix)). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011108091444.A44303>