Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:16:48 +0100
From:      Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
To:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        unixmania@gmail.com, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, nwhitehorn@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r205014 - in head: . sys/amd64/amd64 sys/amd64/conf sys/amd64/include sys/amd64/linux32 sys/compat/freebsd32 sys/compat/ia32 sys/conf sys/fs/procfs sys/ia64/conf sys/ia64/ia64 sys/ia64/...
Message-ID:  <20100317171648.GD7307@hoeg.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20100317.092205.1068292109300099051.imp@bsdimp.com>
References:  <20100313170725.GW8200@hoeg.nl> <20100313.121932.997044077387131740.imp@bsdimp.com> <20100317085004.GB7307@hoeg.nl> <20100317.092205.1068292109300099051.imp@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--kfjH4zxOES6UT95V
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

* M. Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
> I agree with John this is too fine grained.  We don't currently have
> this data for the removals, just when we did.  And it isn't clear that
> our users could easily find this data either, even if we
> dumpster-dived the repo for it.

I do think the same, but maybe in the future we should annotate compat
bits like these in source by specific __FreeBSD_version?

--=20
 Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
 WWW: http://80386.nl/

--kfjH4zxOES6UT95V
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkuhDn8ACgkQ52SDGA2eCwVhjwCdEqETz667A6khpKojLTt2CxZ+
6e8AnR+D/zkHdD7qAaEz4JtbLcrpGUte
=dyna
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--kfjH4zxOES6UT95V--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100317171648.GD7307>