Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:00:57 -0800 From: "Kip Macy" <kip.macy@gmail.com> To: "John Birrell" <jb@what-creek.com> Cc: ????????? Bill Hacker <askbill@conducive.net>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tinderbox Message-ID: <b1fa29170711191500t14920d83u39384e10a7eb3a80@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20071119223350.GA2137@what-creek.com> References: <47420100.2050700@conducive.net> <20071119223350.GA2137@what-creek.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 19, 2007 2:33 PM, John Birrell <jb@what-creek.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 09:32:48PM +0000, ????????? Bill Hacker wrote: > > Can someone kindly throw Tinderbox the appropriate fish? > > I am working on fixing this. Sorry. > > Unfortunately the tinderboxes run with custom CFLAGS. > I would change this if I could, but I'm not the first to mention > how frustrating it is. I have never seen a good argument for why > the tinderbox is different from the CVS defaults. > Ooh ooh - stop right there. I strongly disagree with des choosing custom flags, but he has legitimate reasons for doing so. We are only periodically bitten by the custom flags and the tinderboxes are a huge net win. So NO BIKESHEDDING PLEASE. Thanks. -Kip
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b1fa29170711191500t14920d83u39384e10a7eb3a80>