Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 00:49:49 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> To: Nik Clayton <nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk> Cc: Charles Henrich <henrich@flnet.com>, advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG, Dan Langille <junkmale@xtra.co.nz>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Charles Henrich a Star? Message-ID: <58590.923989789@zippy.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 13 Apr 1999 08:27:12 BST." <19990413082712.A7233@catkin.nothing-going-on.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> "Movie FX company chooses FreeBSD over Linux for increased reliability" Or, even less combatatively: "Movie FX company chooses FreeBSD for overall reliability" Then in the article you can have a paragraph saying how Linux was evaluated and FreeBSD chosen instead, even though the renderman binary was a Linux one. Even if it just states reasons of personal preference for this, it's fine. Just so long as it's not in the headline or makes claims that Linux is somehow less reliable in general (stating a preference is not the same as making bold claims), we're fine. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?58590.923989789>