Date: Sun, 1 Sep 1996 22:18:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu> To: dyson@FreeBSD.org Cc: Nadav Eiron <nadav@barcode.co.il>, scott@statsci.com, Eric.Berenguier@sycomore.fr, questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.1.0 CRASH! Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.94.960901221700.227K-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu> In-Reply-To: <199608311453.JAA00482@dyson.iquest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 31 Aug 1996, John S. Dyson wrote: > Both of the above are technically wrong, but to be conservative in the > worst case, #2 above is the most correct if you want to make sure that > the system never kills any processes or ever hangs. This is of course, > assuming that no processes ever share memory. But, #1 above is > definitely wrong and will not guarantee that the system will not hang > due to out of VM conditions!!! At least when I'm wrong, I get set back right by the proper people. :-) Thanks for setting us all straight. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.94.960901221700.227K-100000>