Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:23:38 -0800 From: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Cc: Michael Vince <mv@roq.com> Subject: Re: FAST_IPSEC vs IPSEC performanc Message-ID: <200411230923.38227.sam@errno.com> In-Reply-To: <41A2FD30.3080301@roq.com> References: <41A2FD30.3080301@roq.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 23 November 2004 01:04 am, Michael Vince wrote: > Hey all. > > I have been googling around the Internet for information about IPSEC and > FAST_IPSEC for freebsd on the Internet and wondered what gives best > performance > when I came across this http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/netperf/ > It has some nice graphs / figures on performance of IPSEC and FAST_IPSEC > via gigabit ethernet devices and as long as I am seeing this correctly > it appears the regular IP_SEC is a fair bit faster in some areas then > FAST_IPSEC. > Does any one know if this information correct? > Anyone done there own benchmarks? My Usenix paper has performancomparisons from a while ago: http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/bsdcon03/tech/full_papers/leffler_ipsec/leffler_ipsec_html/ce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200411230923.38227.sam>