Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 15 Jul 1999 00:44:00 +0200
From:      Phil Regnauld <regnauld@ftf.net>
To:        Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
Cc:        freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: NT vs Linux vs FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <19990715004400.46241@ns.int.ftf.net>
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.19990714142422.0455d7e0@localhost>; from Brett Glass on Wed, Jul 14, 1999 at 02:26:48PM -0600
References:  <4.2.0.58.19990713223011.044ee920@localhost> <Pine.NEB.3.96.990713234618.95939A-100000@shell-2.enteract. com> <4.2.0.58.19990714142422.0455d7e0@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
	[can people PLEASE trim the Cc: ??]

Brett Glass writes:
> 
> That's not what makes a different distribution. As with Linux, the kernel and
> even the userland environment can be identical! All that's needed to distinguish
> a distribution is a different set (or subset) of utilities, a different setup
> program, different bundled application programs, and/or a different default 
> configuration.

	No, to differentiate two distributions, you have to compare
	what each defines to be the base set.

	FreeBSD has a base tree, it's called src+doc(+ports).

	So you would have to compare both dists -- same base set == same
	distribution.

	Or are you trying to give a new meaning to the word distribution ?
	(as in "version")




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990715004400.46241>