Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:47:51 +0000 From: Marwan Sultan <dead_line@hotmail.com> To: <freebsd@edvax.de> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: After freebsd-update - all went wrong. Message-ID: <SNT103-W26FDC0D64F34935E60F92C9A7F0@phx.gbl> In-Reply-To: <20091224153544.d8485e6a.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <SNT103-W22C4196E499B9971E193AE9A7F0@phx.gbl>, <20091224144648.cc5d8ba1.freebsd@edvax.de>, <SNT103-W3264387867388F87CD3BEE9A7F0@phx.gbl>, <20091224153544.d8485e6a.freebsd@edvax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dear Poly=2C =20 /etc/resolv.conf and /etc/hosts and /etc/rc.conf are untouched. =20 The only problem that freebsd ignores the "defaultrouter" line in /etc/rc= .conf and just for the archives=2C kernel has been restored to default=2C but i have recompiled my kernel and its okay. =20 I will today use the ordiary freebsd update (csup) and see if this will f= ix what freebsd-update broke- and will update this list. =20 This is a lesson for me and everyone to never run freebsd-update on a cus= tom kernel system=2C however It shouldnot produce such problem. (i think) =20 Thank you =20 - Marwan Sultan System Administrator =20 > Date: Thu=2C 24 Dec 2009 15:35:44 +0100 > From: freebsd@edvax.de > To: dead_line@hotmail.com > CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: After freebsd-update - all went wrong. >=20 > On Thu=2C 24 Dec 2009 14:06:48 +0000=2C Marwan Sultan <dead_line@hotmail.= com> wrote: > > well=2C I have fixed problem two by installing back my custom kernel. > > but the system still ignores the "defaultroute" command in rc.conf > > this is why we have manuly added to the rc.local >=20 > Is this possibly a spelling error? The setting in rc.conf > is defaultrouter=3D"..." - routeR. >=20 >=20 >=20 > > But eventho it shouldnot touch rc.conf right? >=20 > Correct. The rc.conf file is one of the few ones that > shouldn't be in the scope of freebsd-update or mergemaster > (if you update by source). >=20 >=20 > > my rc.local now has > >=20 > > route add default 66.xx.x.x > > ifconfig em0 66.xx.x.x netmask 255.255.255.255 alias >=20 >=20 >=20 > > If i take it off=2C system will not have any defaultroute > > anymore although its in rc.conf > >=20 > > defaultrouter=3D"66.xx.x.x" > > hostname=3D"xxxxxx.com" > > ifconfig_em0=3D"inet 66.xx.x.x netmask 255.255.255.0" >=20 > Your setting in rc.conf is spelled correctly (see above). >=20 > Could you try what happens if you start the inet subsystem > manually (/etc/rc.d/netif and /etc/rc.d/routing)? The > last one reads defaultrouter=3D"..." from rc.conf. >=20 > As far as I see=2C the settings in rc.conf are completely > valid=2C and should work. If this is still the "old" rc.conf > (that worked before)=2C the services activated in there > should be started=2C too... >=20 > You could additionally check /etc/resolv.conf and /etc/hosts > for any malformed entries. I think /etc/hosts could be > altered / overwritten by freebsd-update? >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Polytropon > Magdeburg=2C Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe=2C Mousa=2C ... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe=2C send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd= .org" =20 _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222986/direct/01/=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?SNT103-W26FDC0D64F34935E60F92C9A7F0>