Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1998 12:20:10 -0400 From: "Allen Smith" <easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu> To: mike@smith.net.au (Mike Smith) Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Looking for feedback on xl (3c905/3c905B) driver Message-ID: <9809061220.ZM8826@beatrice.rutgers.edu> In-Reply-To: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@freebie.dcfinc.com> "Re: Looking for feedback on xl (3c905/3c905B) driver" (Sep 1, 12:38am) References: <199809010422.VAA18744@freebie.dcfinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sep 1, 12:38am, Chad R. Larson (possibly) wrote: > > This was done as part of the announcement. It's also in the commit > > logs, which are the authoratative reference. > > > > Tracking either -stable or -current without reading the logs is like > > anything else your mother warned you about. > > This seems like an escalation of responsibility for the user. > > I've read (and agree) that tracking -stable without subscribing to the > stable mailing list is asking for whatever you get. I'd never heard a > requirement for reading the CVS logs before. If such is to be considered a possible part of the responsibilities... might I suggest the creation of some CVS lists that are specifically filtered for only RELENG_2_2 messages? Sure, people can do it themselves (if we can get the blasted procmail regexps to work right - give me Perl any day...), but that'll save on unnecessary bandwidth wastage from sending out messages that will just get deleted. -Allen -- Allen Smith easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9809061220.ZM8826>