Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 17:10:12 -0600 From: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org> To: Don Bowman <don@sandvine.com> Cc: "'scsi@freebsd.org'" <scsi@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: AAC 2200s and firmware 7244 Message-ID: <20040507231012.GA70586@panzer.kdm.org> In-Reply-To: <FE045D4D9F7AED4CBFF1B3B813C85337045D8CF8@mail.sandvine.com> References: <FE045D4D9F7AED4CBFF1B3B813C85337045D8CF8@mail.sandvine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 18:52:24 -0400, Don Bowman wrote: > From: Scott Long [mailto:scottl@freebsd.org] > > Sent: May 7, 2004 18:21 PM > > To: Don Bowman > > Cc: 'scsi@freebsd.org' > > Subject: Re: AAC 2200s and firmware 7244 > > > > > > Don Bowman wrote: > > > > > Does anyone know if the aac driver on > > > RELENG_4 (and/or CURRENT) supports the firmware > > > which was released yesterday on Adaptec's > > > web site? This is referenced as version 7244. > > > > > > The web page indicates that 'driver version 4.1.0.7244' > > > is required. I'm not sure what that is (the windows > > > version?) or how it maps to freebsd. > > > > > > > > (http://www.adaptec.com/worldwide/support/driverdetail.jsp?ses > s=no&language= > > English+US&cat=/Product/ASR-2200S&filekey=asr2200s_fw_v7244.exe) > > > > --don > > > >So far I've no luck from Adaptec in trying to figure out what this > >means. Given that there is only a new Windows driver but not a new > >Linux driver, it might not be a big deal. In fact, it might just > >be something related to Windows Certification. I'll keep pressing to > >find out. In the mean time, feel free to be the Guinea Pig =-) > > > Well, the guinea pig approached worked ok. It appears that upgrading > the adapter doesn't break anything under FreeBSD aac driver > on RELENG_4, so presumably not on CURRENT either. On a slightly-related topic, any idea what sort of performance have you been able to get out of the 2200S? (The number of disks and what kind of array(s) you have would be helpful to know.) I'm mainly wondering about sequential performance, since random performance is harder to gage. e.g., with my Adaptec 5400S/HP NetRAID 4M, I can get about 92MB sequential read performance with a 6 disk RAID-5, and up to 50MB/sec sequential write performance on the same array. With a RAID-1 array composed of the same disks, I can get 66MB/sec read performance, and up to about 30MB/sec write performance. (I'm using Seagate ST373307LC disks -- 73GB, 10K RPM.) This is with -current from late February. Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@kdm.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040507231012.GA70586>