Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 8 Oct 1997 12:39:16 -0600 (MDT)
From:      Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
To:        Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
Cc:        Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, cliff ainsworth III <cliff@cliffsworld.com>, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: project truck.....ideas wanted 
Message-ID:  <199710081839.MAA11594@rocky.mt.sri.com>
In-Reply-To: <199710081825.DAA00927@word.smith.net.au>
References:  <199710081658.KAA10961@rocky.mt.sri.com> <199710081825.DAA00927@word.smith.net.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Um.  So you are saying that the "introduced" jitter, ie. SA (Selective
> Availability), is actually predictable?  And that this prediction is 
> available to a commercial consumer?  What's the point of it then?

It's not predictable (well, it is, but it's a fairly complex algorithm
that is not published, essentially making it unpredictable).  The point
is that the jitter introduced is the same across all of the recievers in
the same general area, so if one of the receivers isn't moving, you can
take the 'difference' of the changes made to it and apply it to the
values on the other receivers taken at the same time.

(In case anyone is concerned, my brother-in-law at the State of Montana
is also doing this, so it's not like it's a state secret or
anything. *grin*)

Another rumor I've heard about is that the introduced jitter may go
away.  Interestingly enough, during the most recent 'war' (Desert
Storm), there weren't enough GPS receivers that could read the
'encrypted' channel which has no introduced jitter, so they ended up
turning off SA and using standard commercial receivers.  It kind of
defeats the purpose.  That, and DGPS has made it virtually useless for
anything 'sensitive', so there is serious consideration being made to
kill it.

But, many of the GPS manufacturers are fighting it, because it makes
alot of their 'new generation' products useless, which rely on the
introduced jitter.  *sigh* Capitalism at it's worst.



Nate



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710081839.MAA11594>