Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 23 Jan 2010 10:09:00 +0000 (UTC)
From:      "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
To:        Nat Howard <freebsd-stable@track.pupworks.com>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: IPSec NAT-T in transport mode
Message-ID:  <20100123100713.X50938@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
In-Reply-To: <B0B23035-26CD-45AE-96A0-D16957412C70@track.pupworks.com>
References:  <B0B23035-26CD-45AE-96A0-D16957412C70@track.pupworks.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, Nat Howard wrote:

> I'm very interested in this problem -- I want to run an L2TP server myself.   Is anyone actually working on this?  I might be able to chip in a few bucks...
>
> But I'm not seeing bad checksums.   Here's my setup:
>
>
> L2tp server  A<---------------->B  Freebsd NAT box C <-----------internal network----------->D my mac
>
> Where should I be seeing the bad checksums?  A, B, C, or D?
>
>
> Looking only at B, I don't see any bad udp checksums, but I'm seeing a bunch of these (IP numbers changed to bracketed names):

This doesn't say if you are using IPsec but I will asume so, that
would mean that you D "my mac" would initiate the connection and
the A node "L2tp server" would then be the other end.  If that's a
FreeBSD box as well, you should check statistics there.  The NAT
gateway in between has nothing to do with this, only the IPsec ends.

/bz

-- 
Bjoern A. Zeeb         It will not break if you know what you are doing.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100123100713.X50938>