Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 17:54:19 +0930 From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> To: Andrew Reilly <areilly@bigpond.net.au> Cc: Doug Barton <DougB@DougBarton.net>, David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed to rpcbind Message-ID: <20010326175419.X40349@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <20010326181905.B75840@gurney.reilly.home>; from areilly@bigpond.net.au on Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 06:19:06PM %2B1000 References: <20010321104438.A94096@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010326090306.D40349@wantadilla.lemis.com> <3ABEF43A.D4DA1929@DougBarton.net> <20010326172414.V40349@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20010326181905.B75840@gurney.reilly.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday, 26 March 2001 at 18:19:06 +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:24:14PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote: >> On Sunday, 25 March 2001 at 23:48:10 -0800, Doug Barton wrote: >>> Greg Lehey wrote: >>>> >>>> On Wednesday, 21 March 2001 at 10:44:38 -0800, David O'Brien wrote: >>>>> The Portmapper binary has been renamed from `portmap' to `rpcbind'. >>>> >>>> Why? >>> >>> So we can be more like sysV >> >> This is good? > > If it's the best path to NFS over IPv6, which seems to be the > issue, then sure it's good. > > Play the ball, not the man. I don't have an objection to the change, I was just asking. And "because System V does it this way" has never been a good answer for us. And no, I'm not picking on Doug, just making a point. Greg -- Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010326175419.X40349>